Business Valuation Expert Witness Reports and Discovery – A Jurisdictional Analysis

discovery-devices

Generally, business valuation experts should provide a written report explaining their opinion of the value of the asset or business interest that is the subject of the litigation. However, the procedural rules that govern the disclosure of expert witnesses and requirements relating to written appraisal reports differ drastically between jurisdictions. These rules should be reviewed to ensure that all the required information is covered, and expert is timely disclosed so that he or she may testify at trial.

Several discovery devices are available to the parties in a civil or criminal proceeding. A discovery device is a procedure employed by a party, before trial, to require the adverse party to disclose information that is essential for the preparation of the requesting party’s case.  The most used discovery devices in the context of an asset or business valuation are:

  • Disclosure and written report requirements
  • Interrogatories
  • Depositions

Below is a summary of discovery rules by jurisdiction. This summary is provided for elaboration purposes only and is not updated regularly. Parties should consult an attorney for the specifics of the jurisdiction in which the case is being litigated:

JurisdictionWritten Expert Report RequiredInterrogatories to expert allowed?Deposition of expert allowed?
FederalYesYesYes
AlabamaNoYesWith Court Order Only
AlaskaYesYesYes
ArizonaNoYesYes
ArkansasNoYesWith Court Order Only
CaliforniaOn-demandYesYes
ColoradoYesYesYes
ConnecticutSummaryYesYes
DelawareNoYesWith Court Order Only
District of ColumbiaNoYesWith Court Order Only
FloridaNoYesYes
GeorgiaNoYesYes
GuamNoYesWith Court Order Only
HawaiiNoYesYes
IdahoNoYesYes
IllinoisIf Interrogatory ServedYesYes
IndianaNoYesWith Court Order Only
IowaIf RequestedYesYes
KansasSummaryYesYes
KentuckyNoYesMust serve interrogatories first
LouisianaNoYesYes
MaineNoYesWith Court Order Only
MarylandIf Interrogatories ServedYesYes
MassachusettsNoYesWith Court Order Only
MichiganNoYesYes
MinnesotaNoYesWith Court Order Only
MississippiNoYesWith Court Order Only
MissouriNoYesYes
MontanaNoYesWith Court Order Only
NebraskaNoYesWith Court Order Only
NevadaYesYesYes
New HampshireYesYesYes
New JerseyIf interrogatory servedYesYes
New MexicoNoYesWith Court Order Only
New YorkNoYesWith Court Order Only
North CarolinaNoYesWith Court Order Only
North DakotaNoYesYes
OhioNoYesMust Show Exceptional Circumstances
OklahomaNoYesMust Serve Interrogatories First
OregonNoNoNo
PennsylvaniaIf Interrogatory served, discretionary with answering partyYesWith Court Order Only
Puerto RicoNoYesWith Court Order Only
Rhode IslandNoYesMust serve interrogatories first
South CarolinaNoYesYes
South DakotaNoYesWith Court Order Only
TennesseeNoYesYes
TexasIf RequestedNoYes
UtahYesYesYes
VermontNoYesYes
VirginiaNoYesYes
Virgin IslandYesYesYes
WashingtonNoYesYes
West VirginiaNoYesYes
WisconsinNoYesYes
WyomingNoYesYes

Only Six State Jurisdictions i.e. Alaska, Colorado, Nevada, New Hampshire, Utah, and the Virgin Islands, required a written expert report under rules like Federal Rules (specifically FRCP 26(a)(2).

California requires a written report if demand is made.

Iowa and Texas require a written report if requested in discovery.

Illinois, Maryland, and New Jersey require a written report if an interrogatory is directed to a party who will call the witness.

Louisiana requires a written report upon contradictory motion of any party or on the Court’s motion.

Pennsylvania provides that the party answering an interrogatory may provide the expert’s report in response or have the expert answer the interrogatory.

The remaining jurisdictions do not require a written report or summary by an expert witness to be provided to the other parties.

Share insights

Email
Facebook
X
LinkedIn